Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
1. Re-Cloaking at Gates - in EVE New Citizens Q&A [original thread]
For me it's come down to experience. I press Warp To and an arbitrary time after that I press MWD+Cloak. It works every time. Well...so far. You just have to learn to live with your ping and adjust accordingly. Sorry if that's not very helpful :S
- by Ancy Denaries - at 2016.09.14 11:19:10
|
2. Sticky:Dev blog: Command Bursts and the New World of Fleet Boosting - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Jason Ozran wrote: - we used to be able to lose SP (yes, it sucks, but at least you were learning from that mistakes and no other games had this...making it a bit special somehow) You still can. Ever fly T3? Jason Ozran wrote: - you made t...
- by Ancy Denaries - at 2016.08.30 12:22:35
|
3. Sticky:Dev blog: Command Bursts and the New World of Fleet Boosting - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Drago Misharie wrote: Lugh Crow-Slave wrote: O.o pvp is player vs player <- no where in that does it say anything about destruction the most obvious form is violent however only people with a very shallow understanding limit it to that ...
- by Ancy Denaries - at 2016.08.30 12:16:06
|
4. Sticky:Dev blog: Command Bursts and the New World of Fleet Boosting - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Spacetramp Sotken wrote: Oh really, and while this fleet is defending Rorqs/Orcas in 2 or 3 systems red fleets are wreaking havoc in every other system. Not every system has every ore or ice in it even in Null. Over the weekend there were cons...
- by Ancy Denaries - at 2016.08.30 12:10:28
|
5. Sticky:Dev blog: Command Bursts and the New World of Fleet Boosting - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Steroidastroid Ormand wrote: 1) 15km range is a joke? Aren't you forgetting a 0 at the end? 2) This whole idea is ok as long as you offer a way to reimburse players who want to trash their characters after this patch. For example make all comm...
- by Ancy Denaries - at 2016.08.29 18:52:03
|
6. Sticky:Dev blog: Command Bursts and the New World of Fleet Boosting - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Drago Shouna wrote: I was about to buy a Rorq, man I'm so glad I didn't now. Once again Fozzie, Seagull and team 5o screw over a whole part of the game to provide targets.... How many mining fleets can you see in null having one on grid? No c...
- by Ancy Denaries - at 2016.08.29 18:51:17
|
7. Sticky:Dev blog: Command Bursts and the New World of Fleet Boosting - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Draconas109 wrote: these boosting changes are flat out ********, on grid mining boosts that require ammunition to run. Has CCP ever tried to be in a null industrialists boots for a week without their dev tools and see how annoying it is to min...
- by Ancy Denaries - at 2016.08.29 18:46:51
|
8. Sticky:Dev blog: Command Bursts and the New World of Fleet Boosting - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Rowells wrote: Yep. Completely new bonus. A creative one, no doubt, but I still believe that by itself it doesn't really do nearly as much as the other two. I worry that it will become one of those boosts that doesn't really get used because it...
- by Ancy Denaries - at 2016.08.29 18:45:30
|
9. Sticky:Dev blog: Command Bursts and the New World of Fleet Boosting - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Triggered Liberal wrote: Querns wrote: Triggered Liberal wrote: So RIP my entire community. This seems like a concerted attack on my alliance. Your community is based on offgrid boosting? Yup. We mine while we work. The boosts were w...
- by Ancy Denaries - at 2016.08.29 18:41:33
|
10. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Malcolm Lionel wrote: gg mining. It was fun. If you had to isbox to mine, it wasn't really fun. ;)
- by Ancy Denaries - at 2014.11.25 19:15:27
|
11. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Querns wrote: Veers Belvar wrote: Big +1 on the decision, but I'm worried it doesn't go far enough. People will just purchase more screens, and manually control multiple accounts. It'll be harder, surely, but it's still viable to manually co...
- by Ancy Denaries - at 2014.11.25 18:26:59
|
12. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: So honest question here. Is this rig still legit or is it also banned? Quote: We would like to clarify that it does not matter how Input Broadcasting and Input Multiplexing are being done, whether through use of software...
- by Ancy Denaries - at 2014.11.25 18:26:03
|
13. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Zechariah Jericho wrote: Guys the toxic is getting high Was in the middle of showing a friend this game, got to general discussion "what's that?" >>> 6 minutes later he decides he doesn't want to play because of our community and how b...
- by Ancy Denaries - at 2014.11.25 18:22:58
|
14. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Sarah Flynt wrote: Who are you and what have you done to the CCP as we knew it (not only this change but what's been happening over maybe the last half year)? The irony is that a woman had to take the helm in order for CCP to grow some balls. ...
- by Ancy Denaries - at 2014.11.25 18:12:30
|
15. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
*failpost*
- by Ancy Denaries - at 2014.11.25 18:11:04
|
16. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
XXXMina wrote: this is not right, you cant change the rules after 10 years, i got 5 accounts because it made sense with how the game is. now i cant use what little automation i take advantage of (just pressing the f keys ) . also jump fatigue a...
- by Ancy Denaries - at 2014.11.25 17:49:54
|
17. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Radkiel wrote: You didn't adapt, you just cried like a little ***** until you got you way. Anti-multi-boxers are all the same, they see something they can't or won't do, so it must be stopped. I really excepted a much more mature community in E...
- by Ancy Denaries - at 2014.11.25 17:47:18
|
18. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Nituspar wrote: As someone who has extensively used ISBoxer for the last year I'd like to thank CCP for having the courage to make this change, and the way it's being implemented. The grace time will allow people who invested heavily into the ...
- by Ancy Denaries - at 2014.11.25 17:28:25
|
19. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
marly cortez wrote: The Sandbox ....What can be will be......except when we decide it's not to be. Compliments of CCP... Feed me your multiboxing tears <3
- by Ancy Denaries - at 2014.11.25 17:27:01
|
20. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Fiberton wrote: Hrm so Mining goods are about to sky rocket. Ok so I have never used one of these things you speak of but even I after over 10 years in the game know that this is a terrible idea. So when you are making decisions did you consult...
- by Ancy Denaries - at 2014.11.25 17:24:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |